The Spanish association Liberum announces that its legal team has finalized the first Spanish lawsuit addressed to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which will be filed on November 24 and 25, 2025 in Strasbourg, against those responsible for COVID-19 and for disproportionate preventive measures, such as “mass confinements, the closure of economic activity and the imposition of digital passes, among other measures, all of them infringing fundamental rights,” they explain from Liberum.
During those days when the European Parliament will hold a plenary session, the exact content of that lawsuit will be disclosed. From Liberum they recall the long path that has led them to the ECtHR.
On January 27, 2025, the Liberum Association together with a citizen affected by the coercive measures imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic filed a criminal complaint before the Supreme Court (special case 20141/2025), “against the national and international responsible parties for the origin of COVID-19 and for the measures imposed without scientific basis on the entire population, knowingly of all this,” they add.
That complaint contained 365 pages, which included the most relevant facts, which question the official narrative of the origin of the pandemic known as COVID-19 and denounce the implications of national and international authorities to hide from the world population the truth, not only about the origin of the pandemic, but also about its responsible parties, despite the fact that millions of people around the world were tragically affected, losing their jobs, livelihoods, health and even life. Alongside the complaint, the Liberum Association provided to the Supreme Court thousands of pages of documentation, official reports and public contracts that corroborate the facts alleged.
The documentation provided then was “the Final Report of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic of the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, of the United States House of Representatives, dated December 4, 2024, whose 520 pages denounce the official lies about the origin of the pandemic and the scientifically baseless restrictive measures that forced the population to obey to avoid discrimination, loss of employment or fines,” they explain from Liberum.
The Supreme Court prosecutor made some comments about that complaint: “it is noted that the exhaustive final report dated December 4, 2024, prepared by the Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, of the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, of the United States House of Representatives corroborates the most significant facts of the complaint, goes on to analyze the most significant points in order to clarify the alleged crimes in which the investigated may have incurred. The report states that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, probably arose due to an accident related to a laboratory or an investigation, the report cites an unclassified fact sheet titled.”
THE PROSECUTOR ON THE COVID DOCUMENT
The prosecutor also wrote that in that document “it is alluded that both the US Department of Energy and the FBI in February 2023 had acknowledged the same. It also alludes to a 2023 CIA document on the origin of COVID-19, as well as news reports collected in the report from various dates, and opinions of various scientists from various years. The report concludes that since January 2020 the body of evidence has grown stronger in support of the lab leak theory. It also alludes to an attempt to cover up the leak and to uphold the natural origin of COVID-19, which would have had the purpose of defending […], and reducing the possibility of an increase in biosafety measures and laboratory regulation.”
However, a Supreme Court order dated February 27, 2025 ruled the complaint inadmissible because there is “no criminal fault in the conduct of the defendants in their actions.”
On May 27, 2025, the corresponding constitutional protection appeal was filed with the Constitutional Court against the Supreme Court’s Order that dismissed the complaint, assigning the protection appeal with number 3765-2025. The protection appeal was basically based on two violations of fundamental rights caused by the Supreme Court’s Order, due to the denial to investigate the reported facts: The right to truth and the right to information.
Liberum will travel to Strasbourg those days “to inform all of Europe and the world about the lawsuit that will be presented before this Court in order for the right of peoples to know the truth about the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic to be recognized,” that “the responsible parties be identified and compensated for the damage caused by the restrictive measures imposed on citizens without scientific basis,” they state in a press release.
And they also add that they request that “the right to freedom of expression be protected in times of health crisis.”
